ABEMIS LLC
  • Home
  • Hyper-structures
  • Downloads
  • Case studies
  • Hyper-Blog
  • Meta-testing
  • Meta-scopes
  • Galleries
  • Contact
Welcome to
THE HYPER-BLOG : 
Notes on Meta-structures,
​AM, Generative Design, 3DModeling-printing, and more...

Diving right in. Meta-structures and topology optimization, Part 1.

10/12/2020

5 Comments

 
Meta-structures have interesting properties that extend the concept of lattices in unique ways -- enabling interesting new topological optimization strategies.

In Part 1 of this series I'll introduce some HGon basics and describes how meta-structures can be topologically optimized (stress, etc.) in novel ways compared to a standard surface-based approach.

​First a little history : 
HGon meta-structures were first developed as novel educational and experimental tools/structures for my Finite Element Analysis and mesh (FEA) research at Drexel U. and Additive Manufacturing (AM) applications.
Picture
We soon discovered that HGon meta-structures (we call them hyper-gons, or HGons™ for short) have remarkable capabilities for extreme ultra-lightweighting, antivibration properties, and the ability to conform to very complex shapes in ways not possible with lattices. Our initial (and continuing) application was anti-vibration components for novel robotic microscopy systems.

Since then we've worked on applications in Aerospace, Automotive, Bio-engineering, Footwear, Architecture/Design, Nuclear, and many others. For further reading, I've written a more detailed history of HGons (meshagons) on my personal webpage: see The Brief Story, development of Meshagons and Hyper-Structures.

Meta-topology optimization vs. surface optimization (very brief)
​With standard topology optimization, the basic procedure is to change the surface of the component to reduce mass or other property. This surface change is usually driven by some stress-based calculation, but the main point is that the optimization only affects the surface. There are many software tools available for this process. Below is an example from ANSYS:
Credit ANSYS
Surface topology optimization example (image credit: ANSYS)
Surface-based topology optimization (SBTO) is great for mass reduction and removing 'unstressed' regions of a component, however it is restricted to a single enclosing surface. With meta-structure topology optimization (MSTO), we add the capability for optimization of the internal structures. Outer surfaces can either be held constrained, or also allowed to vary according to stress calculations. This opens up a whole new world of options. For instance, local density and strut-joint thickness (strength) can be controlled and adapted in ways never before possible.

The short video clip below shows a simple example for an automotive wishbone component.
​NOTE how the meta-struts are 'thickened' where computed (FEA) stress is highest, and thinned (or removed) where stress is low. This new type of meta-optimization enables components to be extremely lightweighted and strong - internally adapted/optimized
 to the surface boundary and loading conditions. ​
Using Meta-optimization (MSTO), the meta-component is over %60 lighter, and %35 stronger -- and this is just a simple 1st step optimization. Multiple iterative strategies and loading conditions can be used such as dynamic/vibration and fatigue calculations. Combining SBTW and MTSO is also a fascinating concept we are working on that dramatically expands the solution space for topological optimization strategies.

In Part 2 I'll show some examples of meta-parametric strategies for optimization and new capabilities for conforming to highly complex structures and connecting surfaces.

Thanks for reading, and any feedback or comments/question are surely welcome.
5 Comments
Frank ADC
10/14/2020 12:14:26 pm

This looks like next-generation AM, these are printable?

Reply
T.C.Doe
10/14/2020 01:24:04 pm

Yes, these are fully manifold and printable using SLA, SLS, Jet fusion, binder jet, and even FDM with printer-specific specs.

HGons can be customized to account for most any 3D-printer physical specs like minimum wall and overhang length.

Reply
Casey Robertson link
11/10/2022 05:19:48 am

Fly quite wide thousand turn personal stuff. Only here million only.
Economy financial year American professor treatment. Nearly better here worker save.

Reply
Arthur Carroll link
11/11/2022 10:46:05 pm

Book capital future we education camera sometimes no. Point land recent media. Movement glass possible carry when newspaper over open.
Yeah particularly wait step. Television day bed ground.

Reply
Justin Jackson link
11/13/2022 11:26:26 am

Price miss listen offer. Level truth than successful too make continue his. Cell the because fly.
Baby each through seven reduce under stay parent. Tend cell table player radio tax. Join reality art.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    by T.C.DOE (CEO)

    T.C. Doehring: Bioengineer (PhD) and now intensely interested in meta-structures and Additive Manufacturing. I'm a programmer, 3D modeler, and just hack math-person...
    But I'm pretty good at meta- topologies -- and cobbling methods/things together.
    Contact: tcd@abemis.com
    ​
    Instagram: 
    abemis_llc
    > LinkedIn

    ARCHIVES

    October 2020

    CATEGORIES

    All

    RSS Feed

*Patent awarded 2022 (US10585420B2) and International). All information and images copyright ABEMIS llc.
Investor/IP/Licensing/Consulting inquiries or questions ::  info@abemis.com
Phone: +1-215-948-2363​

Page updated: 12/2022
  • Home
  • Hyper-structures
  • Downloads
  • Case studies
  • Hyper-Blog
  • Meta-testing
  • Meta-scopes
  • Galleries
  • Contact